----- Am 23. Jul 2019 um 19:26 schrieb Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de:
> ----- Am 23. Jul 2019 um 17:30 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: > >> One random thought is how to ensure that patches from people with >> hardware who submit patches to fix bugs get through the process. >> We have generally trusted people who have hardware. This is common >> for boards none of us have. >> >> Also we have relied on a timeout rule and a level of significance. Like >> yesterday >> I committed a one-character fix for an error message in ticker. >> >> There is also a level of significance where a ticket is required. >> >> Yes we generally want an independent review but we have generally >> all had a threshold where that's needed. > > Ok, I will try to mix in some common sense in the next version. > > What do you think about the digital signature stuff? Is this overkill? Could > it > be something which NASA would use? I didn't talk with ESA about this (they are > currently on holidays). It is just some idea I had this weekend. An alternative to this digital signature stuff is a replacement of MD5 for the fingerprint with a proper hash function, e.g. SHA512. Users can then simply dump the fingerprints into a report and later on check if requirements changed. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
