On 11/7/19 4:53 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/07/2019 08:45, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 11/7/19 4:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> >>> I sent a GCC patch doing this a couple of year ago and it was rejected. The >>> alternative was to add a separate libjffs2.a. >>> >> >> I could not find anything about this with google to see why. > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008191.html > > I think using separate libraries for things which depend on libz.a is all > right. >
Oh posted here, I checked gcc lists. :) Patch looks fine to me. We should attempt to resolve anything that is automatically pulled in by gcc. If the argument for -lz holds then -lrtems* should be reconsidered and removed. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
