On 28/6/19 6:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 28/06/2019 01:37, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 27/6/19 10:08 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> I would like to get rid of the -qrtems command for normal RTEMS >>> applications. >> I do not think you can remove -qrtems as it will break all existing configure >> scripts. The default needs to be stubs. > > Ok, this was just some side-effect of an attempt to get rid of the bsp_specs. > What about the attached patch.
I am sorry I do not know without testing it. > You can add startfiles via the linker command file. Is it possible to add also > endfiles? I didn't find anything in the GNU ld documentation about this. Having the start files in linkercmd files is something I have wondered about for a long time and I think it is a good idea. I think anything that removes our dependence on per BSP or even external specs file is a good thing. I think the way we have a BPS centric build and install makes it difficult to generalise. For example any configure script that tests for networking fails without the full BSP set of options plus -lbsd. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
