The license is fine. 3-BSD is compatible for us to use. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, 3:28 AM Christian Mauderer <l...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> On 20/06/2019 11:04, Nils Hölscher wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to discuss the attached TI-license. > > Is it RTEMS compatible? > > As far as I can see It has no copy left, but the license has to be > > distributed with binarys. > > > > Best, > > Nils > > > > /* > > * prussdrv.c > > * > > * User space driver for PRUSS > > * > > * Copyright (C) 2012 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ > > * > > * > > * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > > * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > > * are met: > > * > > * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > > * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > > * > > * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > > * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > > * documentation and/or other materials provided with the > > * distribution. > > * > > * Neither the name of Texas Instruments Incorporated nor the names of > > * its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived > > * from this software without specific prior written permission. > > * > > * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS > > * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT > > * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR > > * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT > > * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, > > * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT > > * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, > > * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY > > * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > > * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE > > * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > > * > > */ > > > > It looks like a default BSD-3-Clause license: > > https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause > > The only difference is that TI wrote "IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT > OWNER ..." while opensource.org writes "IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT > HOLDER ...". I don't think that's a relevant difference? > > RTEMS wants to use 2-Clause-BSD for new code. To be honest: I really > have no idea whether the two are compatible. > > Best regards > > Christian > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
