On 31/5/19 2:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 31/05/2019 01:38, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 30/5/19 7:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Since this program runs on the host, you can also use GPL or LGPL software. >> Hmm the rtems-tools package is aiming for no GPL or LGPL. There are a few GPL >> files in it at the moment which could be replaced if we need too but this has >> not happened yet. I would prefer we find other alternatives and avoid GPL >> rather >> than encourage it. > > I don't encourage the use of these licenses, but using lttng-ust for example > should be fine on the host, but not on RTEMS (see begin of this thread):
Sorry, I should have been more explicit and maybe did not understand the full context. I am concerned about GPL or LGPL code being add to rtems-tools as I feel mixed licenses is confusing. The use of GPL or LGPL as packages built on a host is fine. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
