On 14/5/19 2:58 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 14/05/2019 00:53, Chris Johns wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The change makes sense from a security point of view but are you sure there >> are >> no references to these symbols for those users who do not need this stuff to >> work? > > I added these weak definitions along with an update to a new FreeBSD baseline > in > 2016. Since 2017 we have a test for getentropy() in the test suite: > > testsuites/libtests/getentropy01/init.c >
OK. >> >> On 13/5/19 7:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Module: rtems-libbsd >>> Branch: master >>> Commit: ab80f78a20cae1f580d3474a43a0973b9ad2f1c5 >>> Changeset: >>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?id=ab80f78a20cae1f580d3474a43a0973b9ad2f1c5 >>> >>> >>> Author: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> >>> Date: Mon May 13 10:33:19 2019 +0200 >>> >>> Remove dangerous weak definition of getentropy() >>> >>> All BSP supporting libbsd should provide this function. >> Would some documentation on what they need to do and at the risk of being >> flamed >> by security specialists a sample implementation or link a user can use to see >> what is needed be useful? > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/getentropy.html > Fantastic and thank you. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
