Definitely fixes. Posting patch now. On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:49 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> LOL. I thought i would fix it while you were asleep. I have a build now. > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> ----- Am 14. Mrz 2019 um 19:15 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:11 PM Sebastian Huber < >> > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> > >> >> ----- Am 14. Mrz 2019 um 18:29 schrieb Amaan Cheval >> amaan.che...@gmail.com >> >> : >> >> >> >> > Quick note; I'm not at the computer, but I haven't tested with the >> RTEMS >> >> 6 >> >> > buildsets - I can do that tomorrow too. >> >> >> >> The RTEMS 6 tool chain should not use patches. It is intended to test >> the >> >> upstream versions. >> >> >> >> Why can't we use GCC 9 for x86_64 just like for riscv and or1k? >> >> >> > >> > That sounds reasonable to me. It won't be an outlier and we have no >> > deployed systems on >> > x86_64 to worry about.. >> >> Ok, I changed it to GCC 9. I hope this fixes the BSP build issues. >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
