On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 11:01 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 10/3/19 2:18 am, j...@rtems.org wrote: > > Testing time : 0:03:48.073542 > > Average test time: 0:00:00.384610 > > > > Host > > ==== > > Linux-3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-centos-7.5.1804-Core (Linux > rtbf64c.rtems.com 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 21:49:04 > UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64) > > > > Configuration > > ============= > > Version: 5.0.0.08ef50ff6a3b712cef5bcdeb78c531bc6a3e0f9e > > Build : RTEMS_NETWORKING,RTEMS_POSIX_API > > Tools : 7.4.0 20181206 (RTEMS 5, RSB > 38241392a4f96dabf2d1aba51a43dcb623db4dfb, Newlib 1d35a003f) > > > > Summary > > ======= > > > > Passed: 583 > > Failed: 1 > > User Input: 5 > > Expected Fail: 0 > > Indeterminate: 0 > > Benchmark: 3 > > Timeout: 1 > > Invalid: 0 > > Wrong Version: 0 > > Wrong Build: 0 > > Wrong Tools: 0 > > ------------------ > > Total: 593 > > > > Failures: > > dl09.exe > > This test needs a lot of memory to run. It loads modules 64K apart to test > the > trampolines. I think there is an option to increase the memory of this > simulator > but I am not sure. > > I am wondering if we need a file called 'disable -large-memory-tests.tcfg' > with > dl09.exe excluded. >
Some of the tests are known to be deliberate memory pigs. This would be good. Commonly excluded tests would be obvious candidates. I need to investigate the impact of enabling debug and profiling on the failures. All built for me without those enabled. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
