On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 5:03 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 1/3/19 10:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 4:50 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This test has a number of config values that overflow the memory on > the > > powerpc/mpc5643l_dpu BSP. Can these value be reduced so they can fit? > > > > I can provide support in .tcfg files now to provide specific per BSP > settings > > but I am not sure what the values should be for this BSP? Some > guidance is most > > welcome. > > Unfortunately I think this is a test like the old sp09 which crammed too > much > > into one executable. I think it needs to be split into multiple tests. > Ideally > > one per object class. > > That would work. I am wondering about values like 37, 41, 43, etc ... >
>From my reading of the test 3 would be effective. > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_BARRIERS 2 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_MESSAGE_QUEUES 7 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PARTITIONS 37 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PERIODS 41 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_REGIONS 43 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_SEMAPHORES 47 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TASKS 11 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TIMERS 59 > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_USER_EXTENSIONS 17 > > They look unusual enough to mean something or they are random, I cannot > tell. > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
