Hi Joel Pinto, On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:13 AM Joel Oliveira Pinto <jo...@isep.ipp.pt> wrote:
> Hello everyone, > > > After studying the implementation of the Constant Bandwidth Server (CBS) > scheduler in RTEMS, I realized that it does not respect what is proposed in > the original paper by Abeni and Buttazzo. For instance, RTEMS > implementation does not support the following: > > • Serve several threads within a server and deal with their deadlines > accordingly; > > • Replenish the budget of the server and postpone its deadline when the > server budget is exhausted; > > > I’ve been implementing a new version of CBS that supports the rules above > and that resembles the original paper as much as possible and I’m currently > testing it at the moment. Thus, I would like to know from the community if > there are some specific test cases/benchmarks (besides the X tests that > already exists for CBS) that should be used to test this CBS version or > generally speaking any scheduler in RTEMS? > > I've added in CC the author of the CBS implementation in case he has some further insights. I don't think we had any additional, specific tests besides those you can find in testsuites. > > Regards, > Joel Pinto > [image: Sent from Mailspring] > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
