On 29/1/19 7:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 29/01/2019 09:27, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 28/1/19 9:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> how do we want to proceed with this? >>> >> You have answered my concerns and I am happy with what you are doing and this >> piece of code. > > Thanks for your review and comments. > >> >> I look forward to seeing the trace code being moved into libtrace or >> something >> like this and seeing it grow as a unified package that make's sense to our >> users. > > It looks like a good GSoC project.
Excellent idea. > > Should I move the code to cpukit/libtrace/record instead of > cpukit/libmisc/record? > Yes you might as well if that is OK with you? > I am still struggling with the LD --wrap feature: > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-01/msg00241.html > I am watching. I wish I could help but I do not know the ld code at all. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
