On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 8:10 AM Jiri Gaisler <j...@gaisler.se> wrote:
> Here is a final fix that also corrects the coverage computations. The > parsing of the symbol table made all symbols 2 bytes too large, hence the > wrong annotations. I have manually verified the correlation between sis > coverage output and the covoar coverage calculations and annotations for a > couple of RTEMS tests programs, and there is now a 100% match. > > Please review and let me know if I can push this. > This looks good except it combines the change to allow selecting the format from the command line with the "+1 / -1" fix. They should be separate patches. They are technically good. Just push them as separate patches. > > Jiri. > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
