On 12/15/18 9:17 AM, Jiri Gaisler wrote: >> >> There is a ticket open on 5.1 to have tests that do fail to be tagged as >> "Expected Fail" so we can baseline what is expected. I cannot do this alone >> because I am not sure which ones are expected failures. > > I looked into the failures again and they only occur on leon3 when > compiled with --enable-smp. On erc32 and leon2, and on leon3 without > --enable-smp they run OK. I am working on improving gdb debugging > support for sis-mp, so debugging the failures of the RTEMS tests could > be a good test case to check how well it works. Breakpoints and stepping > in an MP system are not that obvious to handle ...
Let me rephrase that - spinternalerror01 fails on both smp and non-smp builds. I cannot see how the test could work on leon3. The test has a custom boot_card() function that does not call rtems_initialize_executive(), so the AMBA plug&play is not scanned and no UART driver is registered. There cannot be any output unless a UART driver is registered. On erc32 and leon2, the UART drivers are hardwired and do not need rtems_initialize_executive(), so it works there. Maybe the test should be marked as invalid for leon3 ...? Jiri. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
