And now I just got this:
+ /home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-tools//tester/rtems-test
--rtems-tools=/home/joel/rtems-work/tools/5 --rtems-bsp=erc32 --log=run.log
--mail --mail-from=j...@rtems.org --mail-to=bu...@rtems.org .
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-tools/tester/rt/cmd-test.py", line 42,
in <module>
test.run(sys.argv[1:], command_path = base)
File "/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-tools/tester/rt/test.py", line 247, in
run
smtp_host = mail.smtp_host()
File "/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-tools/rtemstoolkit/mailer.py", line
122, in smtp_host
host = self._get_arg('--smtp-host')
File "/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-tools/rtemstoolkit/mailer.py", line 70,
in _get_arg
value = self.opts.find_arg(arg)[1]
TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
Which looks like something broke in the update.
Now to bed. :)
--joel
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:56 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 14:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 9:34 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org
> > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> > On 03/12/2018 17:27, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > On 03/12/2018 05:53, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >> Timeouts:
> > >> unlimited.exe
> > >
> > > It is strange that this times out. If I run it by hand, then it
> runs without a
> > > failure:
> > >
> > > time psim -i
> ./powerpc-rtems5/c/psim/testsuites/samples/unlimited.exe
> > > [...]
> > > TEST3 : signal task 0a0103e9 to delete, task 999 ending.
> > > TEST3 : completed
> > >
> > > *** END OF TEST UNLIMITED TASK ***
> > >
> > >
> > > *** FATAL ***
> > > fatal source: 5 (RTEMS_FATAL_SOURCE_EXIT)
> > > fatal code: 0 (0x00000000)
> > > RTEMS version: 5.0.0.dedb34f9ef5527a596046ff9cbf19c8a93dfdaee
> > > RTEMS tools: 7.3.0 20180125 (RTEMS 5, RSB
> > > 30da0c720b78eba16a3f5272206c07415368617b, Newlib
> > > 2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f)
> > > executing thread ID: 0x08a010001
> > > executing thread name: UI1
> > >
> > > real 0m2.573s
> > > user 0m2.055s
> > > sys 0m0.294s
> > >
> >
> > Is your rtems-tools fully updated?
> >
> > A lot updated when I just pulled. I will leave it building again when I
> head to bed.
> >
> > Is the host at full load when this test fails?
> >
> > No. Idle otherwise
> >
>
> This would point to a locking issue in the rtems-test command.
>
> Chris
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
