> On 21 Nov 2018, at 5:50 pm, Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> On 17/11/2018 02:02, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 16/11/18 5:08 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> The RTEMS_USE_16_BIT_OBJECT define is not set by an RTEMS port. Remove >>> support for 16-bit object identifiers. If someone really wants to use >>> RTEMS on a 16-bit target, then it is better to use self-contained >>> objects instead of playing around with object identifier optimizations. >> Are self-contained threads supported? > > Do you want to keep this stuff? The 16-bit architectures are not really a > success story with RTEMS.
No and sorry about the confusion. I was just responding to the comment about using self-contained object except thread are not yet supported. RIP 16bit ids. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
