I agree we want to reduce the overall number of executables but the timing tests which block need a large set of tasks which do precisely the right thing. You have to be very careful not to accidentally measure the overhead of _Thread_Handler or any odd initialization.
I am happy to see the cases which don't block or unblock merged into single cases. The newly added pthread attr tmtest has a lot of cases. But blocking, unblocking, and preemption cases need to be separate. They are very precise tests and hard to make sure they measure exactly what you think they measure without extras. --joel On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:30 AM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I asked that before starting to make the test and Dr. Joel asked me to > make a separate one > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:35 PM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Do we really need separate test programs for all these test cases? Can't >> we just add this to psxtmmq01? >> >> The reason for this is that it needs time to load a test program to the >> target. >> >> -- >> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH >> >> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany >> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 >> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 >> E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> PGP : Public key available on request. >> >> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >> >> _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
