On 06/11/2018 23:37, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> There is no need to make the minimum identifier dependent on the maximum
> per allocation.
> ---
> cpukit/score/src/objectinitializeinformation.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/objectinitializeinformation.c
> b/cpukit/score/src/objectinitializeinformation.c
> index 23c7819bfa..9905349213 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/objectinitializeinformation.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/objectinitializeinformation.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ void _Objects_Do_initialize_information(
> )
> {
> static Objects_Control *null_local_table = NULL;
> - uint32_t minimum_index;
> Objects_Maximum maximum_per_allocation;
>
> information->the_api = the_api;
> @@ -88,9 +87,8 @@ void _Objects_Do_initialize_information(
> /*
> * Calculate minimum and maximum Id's
> */
> - minimum_index = (maximum_per_allocation == 0) ? 0 : 1;
I am not sure you can remove this line. Something does not feel right, it was
long ago I wrote the original change and I seem to remember I thought the same
things and added this code after lots of testing. It may be this is not needed
with the way the code initialises managers now, I am not sure. What if someone
pulls in a manager but does not configure any resources?
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
