On 30/10/2018 17:04, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 30/10/2018 06:50, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 26/10/2018 05:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Some of the rtems repos that use waf have a copy of waf at the top of the >>> tree, >>> rtems-libbsd doesn't. I filed https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3553 about >>> this. I >>> used the waf from examples-v2 to build it myself. >>> >>> What version of waf should I commit to this repo? It is definitely better >>> for it >>> to be a version under our control that we recommend. >>> >> I think we should move to the latest. > > Maybe we could add the waf to rtems_waf and then use a symbolic link in the > super project, e.g. > > waf -> rtems_waf/waf > > I am not sure if this works with msys2 and Cygwin. >
Yeap symlinks are copies on Windows most of the time. I think we will need to handle this on a per project (repo) basis. I cannot see an easy solution if we hold waf in to the repo and removing it creates a different set of issues such as users needing to a suitable version and the release process needing to know which version to get and package. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
