On 25/09/2018 15:30, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 25/09/2018 00:27, Chris Johns wrote: >>>>> We would have to go from the symbol to the ELF file to the DWARF info of >>>>> the >>>>> compilation unit. >>>> All info should be directly via the ELF and DWARF format. I do not know if >>>> we >>>> need to reference the ELF symbol table or we can just use the DWARF CU >>>> data. >>>> The >>>> use of objdump should be avoided. >>> I only briefly look into this, but you have to go from the >>> rld::symbols::symbol >>> to the DWARF info somehow if DesiredSymbols.cc:95 is the right spot to add >>> this >>> stuff. >>> >> You could be right. The DWARF info will contain all symbols and more. >> >> Should these files move to the rtems.git repo? > > The *.ini files or which files?
Just the INI files, the files which describe the data. > I would leave the files where they are and fix > the issues first. Afterwards I would think about moving files around across > repositories. Oh of course, that is fine and it makes sense. I would like to understand the tasks and agree on them. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
