On 22/08/2018 22:25, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 22/08/18 14:06, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 6:47 AM Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: >> >> It really is necessary to know how the other architectures implement it. Some >> may turn out to be easy. Others like Epiphany and new may never matter. > > If the niche architectures don't use libbsd (which I guess is the case), then > there is no issue at all. >
Do we document what is supported and what is not supported? Does libbsd have suitable checks on the built RTEMS to know it cannot be supported? FWIW I do not think the idea of "one size fits all" is workable. I think a number of architectures would benefit from a different smaller networking stack. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
