I have added all the libs in cpukit and commented them out. Please have a look at the attached file.
On 26 July 2018 at 04:50, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> --- >> tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini | 11 ++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini >> b/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini >> index a2ec7bc..3900f14 100644 >> --- a/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini >> +++ b/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini >> @@ -29,8 +29,13 @@ >> # >> >> [symbol-sets] >> -sets = score,rtems >> +sets = score,rtems,libblock,libcrypt,libcsupport,libmd,libnetworking >> >> [libraries] >> -score = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/score/libscore.a >> -rtems = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/rtems/librtems.a >> +score = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/score/libscore.a >> +rtems = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/rtems/librtems.a >> +libblock = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libblock/libblock.a >> +libcrypt = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libcrypt/libcrypt.a >> +libcsupport = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libcsupport/libcsupport.a >> +libmd = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libmd/libmd.a >> +libnetworking = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/ >> libnetworking/libnetworking.a >> > > To be at parity with the old reports but reported on finer granularity, > follow the list at > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-testing/tree/rtems-coverage/do_coverage#n507 > > and check what is not listed there that is in cpukit now. For example, > jffs2 > isn't listed in the above. But the things consciously skipped have a good > reason. Add a list of the ones not included. It may make sense to > have something like this for the ones deliberately skipped: > > # librpc = @....libXXX.a > > It will make auditing what's in the cpukit versus the ini file easier. > That's why my old script has them in order and commented out the > ones we were not ready to do or never would. > > But for sure, add posix, sapi, libdl, individual filesystem, and catch > the libmisc subdirectories listed in the old script for inclusion. for new > libmisc content, we can make a decision. > > Don't include libnetworking. As a general rule, we don't do coverage > testing > on networking or any (complex) third party software. > > I don't think dtc will get coverage either. > > That should get us closer. I expect you will find some libraries > to ask questions on. :) > > --joel > > >> -- >> 2.14.4 >> >> >
symbol-sets.ini
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
