The built documentation can more easily be viewed here: http://whatthedude.com/rtems/user/html/bsps/bsps-x86_64.html
It feels a bit convoluted to me at the moment. I'd appreciate feedback on how the documentation may be made more understandable, and on whether the current approach even seems sustainable - specifically, using FreeBSD's bootloader ties us into using the UFS filesystem and can slow down the iterative-development process. In my opinion, this system is good _enough_ for now - we can explore other options later if time permits, but I'd love to hear differing opinions. P.S. - Joel asked earlier if the QEMU that the RSB builds will suffice - for me, it didn't because in it "SDL support is disabled" (and so are all other graphics options). It's likely possible to install FreeBSD without graphics, it may not be worth the effort of setting up - it's likely easier to update the RSB's QEMU to also build graphics support. P.P.S. - Some of the documentation is double-spaced, but this patch isn't. Let me know if it ought to be (the README didn't say anything of the sort, and it isn't consistent throughout). Amaan Cheval (1): user: Add x86_64 BSP chapter user/bsps/bsps-x86_64.rst | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.16.0.rc0 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
