On 18/06/2018 15:00, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 18/06/18 04:33, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 15/06/2018 21:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Assign each system initialization step a number divisible by 256 to >>> allow more easily future additions. Keep the order as is. >> Where are these initialization steps defined? >> >> I cannot see any supporting comments on how the current numbers are >> allocated? > > The initialization steps were reverse engineered from exinit.c: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c?h=4.10 > > They are documented here (needs an update): > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/initialization.html#initializing-rtems >
Thank you. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
