On 07/06/2018 16:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/06/18 07:53, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 07/06/2018 15:39, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Corresponding RTEMS commit is 75933d5d25cd50f80162b7a0d2f66a5534e1763f. >>> >>> Update #3443. >>> --- >>> misc/shgen/AUTHORS | 3 + >>> misc/shgen/COPYING | 340 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> misc/shgen/TODO | 13 ++ >>> misc/shgen/sci.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> misc/shgen/sci.h | 11 ++ >>> misc/shgen/shgen.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> misc/wscript | 9 ++ >>> 7 files changed, 667 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/AUTHORS >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/COPYING >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/TODO >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/sci.c >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/sci.h >>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/shgen.c >>> >>> diff --git a/misc/shgen/AUTHORS b/misc/shgen/AUTHORS >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..225c2fa >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/misc/shgen/AUTHORS >>> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ >>> +Ralf Corsepius (corse...@faw.uni-ulm.de) >>> + * Initial implementation >>> + * generator for sci bitrate table >>> diff --git a/misc/shgen/COPYING b/misc/shgen/COPYING >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..8cc2ef7 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/misc/shgen/COPYING >>> @@ -0,0 +1,340 @@ >>> + >>> + GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE >> The RTEMS tools is almost clean of GPL code. There is a small piece in the >> rtemstoolkit I would to replace but I have not done that yet. > > The nios2gen is also GPL (the RTEMS GPL with linking exception). Is this a > problem?
We are moving to a BSD-2 license so I assumed this is part of that change? > The GCC, GDB and Binutils are also GPL. They are not in this repo. It is about our repos and the compliance obligations users have with our code base. > >> >> Does this tool need to move over? > > I would like to move all host tools out of the RTEMS repository to simplify > the > build. If we get rid of the host tools, then we have only to deal with the > cross-build tools. This is a good thing to do, thank you. > >> Is the sh arch active? > > I don't know. I suggest we remove this code until someone needs it and can resolve this issue. The code is in the 4.11 releases so is easy to find. > There was some activity on this architecture in GCC and Binutils > recently. Some patents expired. This seemed to resurrect this architecture. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperH > I saw this. Until there is some activity it is impossible to know where this will lead. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
