On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> Well, after this summer, maybe you can write a couple of > paravirtualized x86_64 BSPs to run under *nix, *BSD, MacOS, and > Windows to test newlib and rtems on native hosting. > I don't even know how to test newlib natively at this point. I assume make check works. The eventual goal is to have newlib coverage reports. So there is multiple steps to get there. > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > Sigh.. that makes things even more complex. > > > > As a general rule, we probably should just set a goal to run newlib > > tests on an RTEMS BSP and help improve newlib's tests. > > > > --joel > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> Relatedly, you may also want to read through > >> https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2017/msg01216.html > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > I can't find this on FreeBSD head but it looks like a decent > >> > set of tests for fenv and other libm functionality. > >> > > >> > http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/head/tools/regression/lib/msun/ > >> > > >> > Thoughts on incorporating this into our tests? > >> > > >> > --joel > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > devel mailing list > >> > devel@rtems.org > >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel