----- Am 4. Jun 2018 um 16:27 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> Indeed, this 'rtc' shell command seems to be a bit of a misnomer. It >> conflates access to two different clocks, the tod and rtc. Probably, >> it would be better to provide a separate 'tod' command that >> reads/writes the tod values, and refactor this 'rtc' to read/write the >> rtc. I'm not quite sure about the correctness of writing to the rtc >> without updating the tod, though. >> > > Speaking from RTEMS history here. We tended to use Time of Day > to refer to what RTEMS was maintaining and Real-Time Clock to > review to battery backed clocks that are ICs. This matches Wikipedia's > definition and example of a DS1307. > > The driver framework in RTEMS is referred to as RTC but some BSPs > call the driver TOD and name files and directories accordingly. > > Renaming TOD drivers to RTC derived names has been on my wish > list for a long time.
All the RTC drivers should be now in an "rtc" directory. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
