On Sat, May 19, 2018, 5:06 PM Udit agarwal <dev.mada...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> Udit, >> >> Can you please compare pros/cons of FIO, IOZONE, and Bonnie++, >> probably in a blog post is a good idea. >> > Done, here > <http://81.4.107.225/wordpress/index.php/2018/05/19/comparing-io-benchmarks-fio-iozone-and-bonnie/> > is the comparison. > That url has a hard-coded IP address in it. GSoC blogs should be hosted somewhere where they will have a long life with stable URLs. It looks nice though. :) >> The GPLv2 is not a problem for test suites / benchmarks. It is only a >> problem for code that should get merged into the rtems.git. >> >> Gedare >> >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Udit agarwal <dev.mada...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > As discussed in yesterday's IRC meeting, here is the list of different >> IO >> > benchmarks(which are supported by FreeBSD) in the decreasing order of >> their >> > popularity : >> > >> > FIO - License type: GPLv2 - Widely accepted for storage device >> benchmarking >> > IOZONE - License: Customized - Large number of features, Also used for >> > storage benchmarking >> > Bonnie++ - GPLv2 - Widely known filesystem benchmark, Not much used for >> > storage benchmarking. >> > IOMETER - GPLv2 - Out of active development. >> > IORATE - Flexible - Out of active development >> > >> > I have performed SDIO-SDHCI performance analysis using IOZONE. Here are >> the >> > results. And i have documented the process on my blog. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Udit Agarwal >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devel mailing list >> > devel@rtems.org >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
