On Mon, May 14, 2018, 7:12 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14/05/18 14:09, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018, 7:07 AM Sebastian Huber > > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: > > > > On 14/05/18 13:14, Amaan Cheval wrote: > > > Regarding naming, how about we settle on something like > > > "bsps/amd64/amd64_generic", borrowing from how the riscv target is > > > structured? > > > > In case you want to name the new architecture "amd64", then the tool > > chain should be renamed as well, currently we have > > x86_64-rtems5-gcc, etc. > > > > > > The target is picked after the GNU target name. We have always agreed > > with the GNU target name. > > Ok, makes sense. Will the new stuff support the 32-bit instruction set? > I have no idea. On a native Linux or BSD toolset, does -m32 produce the same 32 bit ABI code as i386-elf? I am pretty sure our x86_64 toolset does not have the 32 bit multilibs. In fairness, even though x86_64 appears to be the canonical name, maybe amd64 is an acceptable alias. Internally, the tools use x86_64 though. I would prefer to stick to the canonical name internally. > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
