On 10/5/18 8:47 am, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > Just running covoar there, we seem to be running into some problems at the > source line lookup stage
Thank you for testing this. I assume it builds OK and we can run it? > cpod@cpod ~/development/rtems/leon3 $ covoar -S > /home/cpod/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/score-symbols.ini > -O /home/cpod/coverage_test/test/score > -E/home/cpod/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanations.txt > -p RTEMS-5 -v sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.exe > Processing multiple executable/coverage file pairs > Coverage Format : html > Target : sparc-rtems5 > > Coverage file sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.cov for > executable: sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.exe > Loading symbol sets: > /home/cpod/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/score-symbols.ini > Symbol set: score > Loading library: sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/cpukit/score/libscore.a > cache:load-sym: object files: 192 > cache:load-sym: symbols: 382 > Analyzing 382 symbols > Extracting information from: > sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.exe > Created unified coverage map for _RTEMS_Lock_allocator (0x0 - 0x13) > Created unified coverage map for _RTEMS_Unlock_allocator (0x0 - 0x13) > Created unified coverage map for _API_Mutex_Lock (0x0 - 0x2f) > Created unified coverage map for _API_Mutex_Unlock (0x0 - 0x2f) > Created unified coverage map for _Chain_Initialize (0x0 - 0x4f) > Created unified coverage map for _Freechain_Initialize (0x0 - 0x33) > Created unified coverage map for _Freechain_Get (0x0 - 0x77) > Created unified coverage map for _Freechain_Put (0x0 - 0x27) > Created unified coverage map for _Heap_Allocate_aligned_with_boundary (0x0 - > 0x23f) > ................ > ............... > ............... > Branch always taken found in_Workspace_Handler_initialization (0x4000ab8c - > 0x4000ab8f) > Branch never taken found in _Workspace_Handler_initialization (0x1073785764 - > 0x1073785767) > Branch never taken found in _Workspace_Handler_initialization (0x1073785776 - > 0x1073785779) > Calculate statistics > Looking up source lines for uncovered ranges and branches > Looking up source lines for uncovered ranges in CSWTCH.1 > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'rld::error' > Aborted > > -------------------- > GDB > -------------------- > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007ffff74aa428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) > at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54 > #1 0x00007ffff74ac02a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 > #2 0x00007ffff7ae484d in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #3 0x00007ffff7ae26b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #4 0x00007ffff7ae2701 in std::terminate() () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #5 0x00007ffff7ae2919 in __cxa_throw () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #6 0x000000000042ad4a in rld::dwarf::address::path[abi:cxx11]() const ( > this=this@entry=0x7fffffffcc10) at ../rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.cpp:129 > #7 0x000000000042dfad in rld::dwarf::file::get_source > (this=this@entry=0x6be568, > addr=<optimized out>, source_file="unknown", source_line=@0x7fffffffccdc: > -1) > at ../rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.cpp:860 > #8 0x000000000040d541 in Coverage::ExecutableInfo::getSourceAndLine ( > this=this@entry=0x6be3c0, address=<optimized out>, line="") > at ../tester/covoar/ExecutableInfo.cc:134 > #9 0x000000000040a115 in Coverage::DesiredSymbols::determineSourceLines ( > this=this@entry=0xafee70, theRanges=theRanges@entry=0xd626f0, > theExecutable=0x6be3c0) at ../tester/covoar/DesiredSymbols.cc:411 > #10 0x000000000040a24f in Coverage::DesiredSymbols::findSourceForUncovered ( > this=0xafee70) at ../tester/covoar/DesiredSymbols.cc:440 > #11 0x0000000000406028 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) > at ../tester/covoar/covoar.cc:526 This looks like an exception being thrown in a destructor path. > > I'll attach a trace file I'm using to debug, hopefully you can use this. It > has > to go with hello.exe in the build directory Thank you for this. I will try and see what I find. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
