Hi! The WIP bsp_specs I've been using is here: https://github.com/AmaanC/rtems/blob/ac/stub-x86-link-tests-pre-bspreorg-bak/c/src/lib/libbsp/x86_64/no_bsp/startup/bsp_specs
I think minimizing it and having the linker script take care of things should be possible - I'll have to look into it as I port my branch to the new BSPs layout and clean other WIP hacks up. I'm not familiar enough with linker scripts and the way RTEMS builds yet, so this may take a few days. I'll keep you guys updated as I make progress! Thanks for bringing it up! On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > Hi > > I have a working branch that I managed to shrink bsp_specs to > being empty on some targets. It would be nice if we could > do this from the beginning on x86_64. > > Are the options triggered by -qrtems really needed or implied > already? > > For the BSPs I worked through, it was easy to move the start > file specification to the linkcmds and eliminate the specification > of libraries since they were mostly already correct inside gcc. > > Thanks. > > --joel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
