On 09/04/18 07:38, Chris Johns wrote:
I am not sure if we should omit BSPs which cannot cope with a --enable-* option.
If you want to build all BSPs you want to build all BSPs?
I think it would too hard at this point in time to probe and create a list of
those BSPs that support the options. I am thinking if you use --enable-smp or
--enable-multiprocessing you must provide a list of BSPs so the wildcard or all
default cannot be used. If a user supplies a BSP that is not support that is a
different issue and the need to handle that better for SMP would be nice.
Yes, this sounds good.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
