I like the idea, but to me it would be confusing to have bsp and bspkit at the top level, each having nearly the same directories. (but certainly less confusing than before) At the risk of introducing more work, would it make sense to have bspkit with inc and src subdirectories?
Alan From: devel <devel-boun...@rtems.org> on behalf of Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> Reply-To: "j...@rtems.org" <j...@rtems.org> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 3:39 PM To: "rtems-de...@rtems.org" <devel@rtems.org> Subject: RFC: Move libbsp/libchip to top of tree Hi I thought one of the long term goals was to move libbsp to the top of the tree as bspkit/. Having source nearer the top of the tree and not reflecting the historical existence of c/ and ada/ versions of RTEMS was discussed for waf. I would think with all the work Sebastian has done, we should consider doing this now. One of the rationales was to reduce the differences between the build systems as we switch. Thoughts? -joel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
