On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:48 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 23/01/18 22:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> > >> > If we move them, I prefer this cpukit/include/@RTEMS_CPU@ because it >> > is easier to find header files while browsing the cpukit source >> tree, >> > there is only one place to look in the include subtree. I'm also ok >> > with cpukit/include/arch/@RTEMS_CPU@ to further organize them, which >> > was not an option you listed. >> > >> >> Either works for me. >> >> >> +1 although I kind of lean to having them collected under arch. That >> avoids >> some clutter and avoids the include directory directly under another >> issue. > > > I am not so fond of this subtree special case. It is not self-describing. > You have to know that there exists an -I magic in the build system which > maps some subtrees. The BSP area is not organized like this. Then, I am more > in favour of the original directory: > > cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@/include > > A > > find -name include > > gives you all the include directories. > Fine with me.
> > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
