On 22/01/2018 21:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 22/01/18 01:06, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> I am open to any ideas that improve how we use and manage the RSB. >> >> >> I don't want to move away from release branches or including the versions >> in the files. >> >> Having the versions in the files makes it easy to upgrade all but one or two >> architectures. > > If you use the versions in the files, then each update creates orphan files. > If > you remove these files, then you do basically a rename with a modification. In > addition, you have to search and replace the version in the *.bset files. It > would be much easier to use *.cfg files without a version, e.g. > > tools/rtems-gcc.cfg > tools/rtems-gcc-m32.cfg > tools/rtems-gcc-or1k.cfg >
Yes, I agree. I feel such a change on master is ok and the branches should be left as they are for now and if a situation arises where it is profitable to do we can consider it. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
