On Dec 23, 2017 6:08 PM, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
On 24/12/17 2:44 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I have tried the following patch with gcc's master on the sparc/erc32 with an > empty bsp_specs. It still is linking with crt0.o. I don't see where it is coming > from. > Do I have a subtle typo or is there something else I am missing? Is there a default in ld? I have no idea. Was going to see if I could remove just the end_file portion of our bsp_specs and then ask on GCC for some advice. I think I am.missing something magic. This may not be the final state of the solution but we have to empty the bsp_specs before we can move on. Chris
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel