On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 20/11/17 17:53, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> The purpose of defining these to NULL isn't documented in this test and >> renders this test broken for what seems to be a reason orthogonal to the >> test's apparent purpose. >> > > This test runs in a minimal environment (test runs in boot_card()) to > verify the static initialization of the timecounter infrastructure. > > Running in boot_card() is probably your problem, e.g. not bsp_start() > invocation. Actually, I spotted this based on redefine warnings, not running the test. I will add undef's before the defines. This should run fine since the starting stack is in the right place. --joel > > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornier > <https://maps.google.com/?q=ess+:+Dornier&entry=gmail&source=g>str. 4, > D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
