On 16/11/17 8:59 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 16/11/17 10:32, Chris Johns wrote: >>> In this manual: >>> >>> >>> |/bd/rtems/4.11.0/tools| >>> Production prefix for RTEMS 4.11.0 compiler, debuggers and tools. >>> |/bd/rtems/4.11.0/bsps| >>> Production prefix for RTEMS 4.11.0 Board Support Packages (BSPs). >>> >>> What should be the content of "tools" and "bsps"? >>> >> If you are working on a BSP and installing in a prefix to use, for example >> with >> libbsd, keeping the tools and bsp under separate prefixes lets you delete the >> bsp tree without needing to rebuild the tools. If you use the same prefix for >> the tools and bsp you either need to rebuild both parts or run the risk a >> stale >> file could still be present and effect how things work. There is only an >> install >> and no upgrade for a BSP. > > I always use the same prefix for tools and BSPs. I simply remove a BSP with > "rm > -r $prefix/$arch-rtems$version/$bsp". I never had a problem with stale BSP > files > this way. >
This is looking under the hood a little. If this was part of the install process then it would be easier. Is that something worth thinking about? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
