2017-07-24 8:27 GMT+02:00 Hesham Almatary <heshamelmat...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 23, 2017 5:15 PM, "Denis Obrezkov" <denisobrez...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > 2017-07-23 22:30 GMT+02:00 Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org>: > >> > >> Increasing the stack size effectively eliminated a data corruption > issue. > >> The memory corrupted likely was an RTEMS internal object structure. > >> > >> What is the stack frame size required by each subroutine call? > > > > How can I determine it? > > > > > > If it isn't directly in the CPU's ABI definition, then what is pushed to > the > > stack or reserved on each subroutine call. You may see it in terms of > stack > > pointer, frame pointer, reserved space, etc. > > > > For example, the m68k had a minimum of 4 registers saved and the return > > address. More registers could be saved for complicated methods. > > > > I think some risc CPU has a number like 172 bytes reserved for possible > > register saves. > > > > So the scheme varies > > > >> > >> How much stack to call printf()? > >> > >> The minimum is an educated guess by the porter that is large enough to > run > >> many/most small applications. You should be able to call RTEMS services > and > >> do a context switch. > >> > >> Hope that helps pick one. :) > > > > > > As for now, I have increased the minimum stack size and get the following > > output: > > > > *** LOW MEMORY CLOCK TICK TEST *** > > > > TA1 - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00 12/31/1988 > > > > TA2 - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00 12/31/1988 > > > > TA3 - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00 12/31/1988 > > > > I will try to determine how to proceed further. > > > Do you configure RISC-V to get timer (or any) interrupts? You might > want to disable all sources of interrupts, and make sure no interrupts > are generated at all, just to figure out if the problem is with > interrupt handling (including context save/restore). > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, Denis Obrezkov > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > -- > Hesham > Interrupts are disabled. -- Regards, Denis Obrezkov
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel