On Jun 23, 2017 9:29 AM, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Denis Obrezkov <denisobrez...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ok, then I will try to adapt the default linkcmd file today. >> >> -- >> Regards, Denis Obrezkov > > > Hello all, > It seems that data section wasn't copied from ROM, so I've added the > initialization code > and now I have a proper value. Thus, I can proceed further to new errors. > > I haven't started to develop new linkcmd file, general for the architecture > + specific > for the BSP. Should I? Hesham? > You may want to just get it working first, and then refactor the linkcmds. +1 just make sure it is working when you start doing this. :) > Also, I have a question: > there is a section called 'rwbarrier' and it is placed in data. Should it be > also initialized? > (copied from rom) Everything up to the bss probably should be copied from ROM. Agreed. Is there a crt0 in libgloss for this architecture to check against? Just remember that the order and layout of sections may have implicit ties to the code in the startup. > And is it possible to decrease a required memory amount by restricting a > user to C language usage? > (no C++ sections in linkcmd) > I don't think so. They shouldn't really be having an impact anyway except for C++ applications. All you end up with is a loop to iterate over the list of empty global constructors. > > -- > Regards, Denis Obrezkov > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
