On 3/6/17 10:14 pm, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > I've just realised that I've been fixing problems with the RTEMS > Tester work that has already been done to convert bash scripts to > python, but I probably should of first been trying to get the old > sim-scripts method working from rtems-testing repo because this will > give me more bsps to test qemu with. So I'm now trying to fix the > do_coverage runtime errors due to covoar and its related files being > moved to RTEMS Tester.
I would prefer we do not invest more time in the scripts in the rtems-testing repo. I personally would like to move this repo to under Joel so it becomes a personal repo for him and away from the top level because a new user could think this is the way to test. Which BSPs that support qemu are missing from the rtems-test tool? > I just want to confirm if I'm heading in the right direction. First > get the old sim-scripts method working. Test qemu against > couverture-qemu for bsps common to both. Then do the RSB support for > couverture-qemu. Then get the RTEMS Tester work running and convert > the rest of the sim-scripts. Is that right, or should I continue with > the RTEMS Tester work? I see 2 parts to the RTEMS Tester work, first the ability to run a specific qemu for a BSP and the integration of the coverage support. Is this correct? Where is the repo with the RTEMS Tester you are working on? I saw a post the other day with some extra output and was wanting to ask. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
