Dear all,
On 05/22/2017 11:56 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black. > I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken. > > Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version. > > > This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new > i2c works > on all platforms that the old one did? The previous i2c implementation in the beagle bsp never worked on hardware, only to a limited degree in qemu; replacing it won't make anything worse for anyone. > > --joel > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao > <zsc19940...@outlook.com <mailto:zsc19940...@outlook.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects > > There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the > beagle bone or > > for the beagle xm or other processor? > > I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need > remove the > > old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch? > > > > Best Regards > > Sichen Zhao > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
