On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <dan...@gaisler.com> wrote:
> From: Jacob Hansen <jacob.han...@gaisler.com>
>
> ---
> cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadqimpl.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadqimpl.h
> b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadqimpl.h
> index 574221c..975221c 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadqimpl.h
> +++ b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadqimpl.h
> @@ -1140,9 +1140,7 @@ typedef struct {
> #define THREAD_QUEUE_OBJECT_ASSERT( object_type, wait_queue_member ) \
> RTEMS_STATIC_ASSERT( \
> offsetof( object_type, wait_queue_member ) \
> - == offsetof( Thread_queue_Object, Wait_queue ) \
> - && ( &( ( (object_type *) 0 )->wait_queue_member ) \
> - == ( &( (Thread_queue_Object *) 0 )->Wait_queue ) ), \
> + == offsetof( Thread_queue_Object, Wait_queue ), \
> object_type \
> )
>
Seems oK although it does lose some check. What was llvm/clangs
problem with the second condition?
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
