On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 26/04/2017 10:19, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> static void_func get_exception_handler(rtems_vector_number vector)
>>> {
>>> + void **vbr;
>>> void_func *exception_table;
>>>
>>> - m68k_get_vbr(exception_table);
>>> + m68k_get_vbr(vbr);
>>> +
>>> + exception_table = (void_func *)vbr;
>>>
>>> This looks strange. Can you achieve a similar effect with
>> m68k_get_vbr( (void*)exception_table );
>>
>>
> I think so. I prefer this.
On this architectural variant, m68k_get_vbr() is a macro with an assignment.
This results in the LHS having a cast to get the destination which we had
to work through the code base removing during the gcc 3.4 days.
I tried it and it didn't work. YMMV
--joel
>
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
