On 03/04/2017 23:10, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
Looks good except for the architectures that toolsets did not
build for.
+ avr (don't care)
+ lm32
+ moxie
+ m32c
moxie has the binutils mismatch ticket but after that is fixed,
there is a missing gcc support library to track down why it isn't
built.
lm32 can build the toolset but since rtems is built as part of
the same RSB set and that build failed, the toolset didn't get
installed.
m32c is the same as lm32.
This makes it look like to me that building RTEMS at the same
time as the toolset is not always desirable. Without the toolset
installed, it isn't easy to fix the BSP.
You do not need to build RTEMS, just add `--without-rtems` to the RSB
options. All that changes between development and releases is the default.
But overall, I say it looks good to ship.
I need #2953 and #2950 fixed to create the release. I hope these tickets
are resolved so I can make a release.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
