On 02/03/17 16:23, Gedare Bloom wrote:
In a way, I do like that this shows the different gcc-newlib versions
we use. It might be nice to add a bit of organization to this hashes
file and/or documentation of the procedure for adding/removing
entries.
Maybe it makes more sense to have a separate file for each version
being used, e.g. a gcc-4.8.3 hash file, gcc-4.9.3, gcc-6.0.1, etc?
That should make it easier to maintain the hashes.
I'll leave it to Chris to decide if this is a suitable compromise.
I don't know why this hash stuff caused such an uproar. The hashes are
invariants of the files. If they ever change something is seriously
wrong. Things that never change should be defined exactly once in a system.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
