On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 02/02/17 16:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +Condition Variables >>>>> >>>+=================== >>>>> >>>+ >>>>> >>>+The :c:type:`rtems_condition` provides a condition variable >>>>> >>>synchronization >>>>> >>>+object. >>>>> >>>+ >>>>> >>>+.. c:type:: rtems_condition >>>>> >>>+ >> >> I missed saying this. Maybe 'rtems_condition_variable', or >> 'rtems_condvar', or 'rtems_condition_var'. Condition is a bit too >> generic of a term I think. >> > > Only for the type or also for the operations? > > 1. rtems_condition_variable_signal() > > 2. rtems_condvar_signal() > > 3. rtems_condition_var_signal() > > 4. rtems_condition_signal() > > If we abbreviate, then I am in favour of 2. > I also prefer #2, followed by #1.
> What about _init() vs. _initialize()? > It is usually spelled out as _initialize or _initialization in the rest of the RTEMS API. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
