On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> Yes. They should fail with MAP_FAILED until we get a proper mmap(). >> This can be either detected, or the test can be augmented until we get >> mmap support for shm objects done. >> > > When you say augmented, you mean with an implementation of the > adapter layer you defined that uses malloc() and knows a few names? > I mean to ignore/expect the MAP_FAILED return from mmap and terminate gracefully.
> --joel > >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > psxshm01 and psxshm02 fail on SPARC/erc32. Is this expected? >> > >> > -- >> > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH >> > >> > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany >> > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 >> > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 >> > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> > PGP : Public key available on request. >> > >> > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
