----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org>
> An: "Christian Mauderer" <christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de>
> CC: "RTEMS Devel" <devel@rtems.org>
> Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2016 23:23:42
> Betreff: Re: Building All Output Formats for RTEMS Docs

> On 07/11/2016 19:27, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>
>> with your patch that removes lato and inconsolata, there are now fewer 
>> packages
>> necessary on Arch. It is now not longer necessary to install the quite large
>> texlive-fontsextra (nearly 700MB). Beneath that, the pygmentize packet has
>> somehow been lost in my original patch to the README.
>>
>> I appended a patch that will remove texlive-fontsextra from the Arch Linux
>> section of the README and add pygmentize again.
>>
> 
> I have taken a closer look at the finished output and it is not as good
> which is why the fonts were used before. I am now wondering if we detect
> the better fonts and use them when present.
> 
> If we move to generate docs based on the lowest common denominator we
> may end up with docs that are not the best we could have that reflects
> on the project.
> 
> Chris

Hi Chris,

it would be nice if there are some good visible warnings if fallback packages 
are used. Otherwise it might be hard for someone building the documentation to 
find out why the output looks different.

As an alternative it could be nice to have a configuration option like 
'--no-fallback' that prevents the system from using any fallback fonts or 
packages. This would allow to find all missing packages for the optimal output.

Kind regards

Christian

-- 
--------------------------------------------
embedded brains GmbH
Christian Mauderer
Dornierstr. 4
D-82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de
Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18
Fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
PGP: Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to