On 28/09/2016 19:20, Pavel Pisa wrote:
On Wednesday 28 of September 2016 11:06:19 Sebastian Huber wrote:
In case the name "self-contained" is confusing for this purpose, then I
am happy to replace it with a better alternative.
No, I like self-contained, I have no problem with that. It describes
how it works. I have problem with SEMPAHORE part because
it associates for me with IPC/inter thread even delivery, producer
consumer pattern. Not mutual exclusion of enter to given code.
I am fine with changing the name.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
