Hello Pavel, On 14/07/16 15:04, Pavel Pisa wrote:
The overflow of 64-bit ticks and 34 bit for seconds packed timespec format is not probable but I would like to see support for infinite operation there even if it cost halving range of the most distant timeouts.
with the 34-bits for seconds, we have a year 2514 problem. The 64-bit ticks counter overflows with a 1ns tick interval in about 586 years. So, nothing to worry about from my point of view.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
